About Me

Name: Scooter
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

A few thoughts on the CNN/YouTube Democratic presidential debate

 

The word "terrorism" was mentioned zero (0) times.





One of the questioners was a, you can't make this up if you tried, a snowman.




No word yet as to why the new Captain Kangaroo wasn't able to moderate last night. However, the blogger kids in the studio had a great time on their, you can't make this one up either, bean bag chairs.




Apparently the adult debate is scheduled for next week.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Carbon footprints, offsets and neutralizers- A Quick Guide for Conservatives

Are you completely confused when you listen to liberals explain global warming? Do you ever wonder what a carbon footprint is? Are you up all night trying to determine what a carbon offset is? Do your liberal pals make fun of you because you don't know how to carbon neutralize yourself?



When I was watching the Oscars with my girlfriend(trust me, I'd much rather rip the skin off my hand and stick it in a bowl of hot salt water than watch this award show) our friendly liberal Hollywood elites continued to mention these phrases I had never heard of. After my fifteenth glass of Bordeaux, right before I passed out, I decided that I would research exactly what it was they were rambling on about.

Recently we've heard some news that former Vice President Algore has a huge palace in Tennessee where he uses a lot of energy to heat, cool and light it. It was obvious that Algore tells us to do one thing while he does another. Hypocrisy if you will. At this time, the Algore people were carrying on about how Algore is not a hypocrite at all. They explained that Algore uses many carbon offsets to neutralize his carbon footprint. Suddenly I saw an image in my mind of Leonardo DiCaprio drooling on Algore at the Oscars. So I decided to do my own homework assignment.

You see Algore uses at least twelve times(most estimates
figure it to be at least twenty times)
the power use that the average
American home uses. He does however use many "carbon offsets" to, well offset
his energy use. A "carbon offset" can make your energy use "carbon
neutral". A carbon offset is a way in which you can offset the
carbon you emit into our air.

In lay terms, which is the only way non-algoreans(any/all non-liberal or
non-Democrat who is not smart enough, as the intellectual liberals
who know best for the rest)
can comprehend this is when you emit
gases from, say, your SUV. There are ways to "neutralize" the carbon
effect. One example of a carbon offset can be by planting trees
which turn carbon dioxide into oxygen. Another way is to use a
renewable energy source such as wind, solar and bio fuel. Thus you
have become "carbon neutral". This in turn, lowers your "carbon
footprint" which any Leo DiCaprio fan understands to be the
measurement of the amount of carbon dioxide(CO2) any individual,
organization or government emits into our air.



Algore is able to get away with flying around the world on private
airplanes, using all the energy at his home, cooking/eating beef and
everything else he does that pollutes our air because he is able to
neutralize his carbon footprint by using carbon offsets such as
planting trees around his home, using florescent lightbulbs,
driving around in vehicles that uses 10% bio fuel(the rest is pure
93 octane)
, lecturing the world on how we can better the environment
(which in the environmental camp is actually considered a carbon
offset)
and he soon will be placing solar panels up at his house, er
mansion.

Yes, that is how Algore, Arianna Huffington, Leo DiCaprio, Melissa
Etheridge and the rest of the elite Global Warming opportunists tell
the media and their followers as to why Algore can get away with it. As the great rap masters Public Enemy once said, "Don't believe the hype."

I've planted trees and plants. What have you done to neutralize your
carbon footprint??????




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Open Letter To John Conyers

 

Dear John Con”vict”yers,

Get on with your investigation. Here’s an idea, why don’t you call in former Chief of Staff (which gave a whole new meaning during the Clinton Administration) Leon “ariba ariba” Piñata, George Stephonopwhatever, former Attorney General James (er Janet) Reno and Senator Hillary Rodham to testify why it’s OK for a Democratic president to fire 93 of 94 US Attorneys but against the law for a Republican president to fire 8.

Your Democratic Congress has a worse approval rating than President Bush. How does that 28% approval rating feel? Please continue your investigation. Not only do I see a Republican majority in the next Congress, I see a mega-majority for Republicans once 20 of your blue-doggers will jump ship when they realize what a bunch of morons you, Nancy “I’ll get you my pretty, and your little dog too” Pelosi, Steny “No, I’m not that big blue Eagle from the Muppet Show” Hoyer, Harry “I have front row seats at the next big Caesar’s boxing match” Reid and Chuck “I like Jews but hate Israelis” Schumer and the rest of the Marxist brothers and sisters are.

In other words, to quote the great one, Mark Levin, “You’re a schmuck.”

Just to add a few unnecessary insults your way. Your face looks like a used catcher’s mitt from 1937. You’re about as energetic as Kevin Costner in the Big Chill. Your love of America rivals that of Joe Stalin. You make Satan, the Devil himself, look like a nice guy.

You can kiss my skinny butt.

Sincerely,

Scott Rivette

PS- I can get you a great deal for baby sitting your kids from your second, fourth and sixth wives’, but your hyperactive, alcoholic ninth wife insists on illegally using your Congressional staff for that. Just trying to help.



Any questions on what Johnny is up to???????


Jolly pals, Johnny and Cindy Sheehan


Johnny with buds Louis Farrakhan and Marrion Berry

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »